Developmentally Appropriate Best Practices

For

Middle School Teachers

 

 

Research shows that middle school students (ages 10-14) need to have instruction, curriculum and assessment aligned to their psychological and physical development in order to be successful in school.  This can be more difficult than one might first think because at no other time in their lives, save infancy, are these children going through a more rapid development than they are in their young adolescent years (Van Hoose, Strahan and L’Esperance, 2001).  Therefore, middle school educators need to be, not only well versed in human development, but they must know how to respond accordingly to their students in the continually shifting and changing years of young adolescent development. 

However, research shows that only one out of five middle level teachers receive any specialized young adolescent training and, therefore, many middle school educators consider themselves to be poorly trained in this area (Scales, 1996).  This probably is the result of the way colleges and universities have designed educational coursework for teachers so that they can meet state certification.  For instance, in Maine, teachers are either certified kindergarten through grade eight (K-8) or grade 7 through grade 12 (7-12) and the collegial focus tends to be on the ends of these ranges.  This would seem to indicate that middle school teacher training needs to be arranged as a separate course of study in order to better prepare middle school teachers to meet the developmental needs of their students.  Scales (1996) believes that pre-service and in-service training for middle schools teachers should go beyond the typical teacher preparation and also provide for training with people from other fields, who work with children and families so that these middle school educators can see young adolescents through “the lenses of different professions and perspectives and work together to construct a unified vision and collaborative community” (p. 230).

However, this may not be feasible for many current middle school educators; therefore, there are many self-learned strategies and techniques that middle school teachers can learn and adopt into their best practices.  Anne Wheelock (1998) describes how middle school teachers can meet the needs of their students in standards based education by practicing and incorporating “new rituals, new conversations and new lessons” (p. 88). We have outlined many of the research based strategies so as to develop a responsive ecologies in middle schools.

 

Creating Responsive Ecologies

 

KnowledgeMiddle school educators should develop and apply a knowledge of the developmental stages of children, focusing on ages 10-14. Teachers should refer to the studies of Jean Piaget (developmental), Erik Erikson (developmental), Howard Gardner (multiple intelligences), Carol Gilligan (developmental) and Lawrence Kohlberg (moral development).  Having knowledge of why young adolescents do the things they do, even as simple as the following example, will enable educators to be more effective.

 

Did you know?

One study reported that restroom breaks were significantly lowered, simply by placing mirrors in all of the middle school classrooms (Knowles and Brown, 2000).  It is believed this is due to young adolescents being overly concerned with their appearance and requiring the continual need of reassurance that the mirror provided.  (One mother reported that her 13 year-old son rides in the car with the visor mirror down!)

FlexibilityA word of caution is that this age group will also experience these changes in uneven stages, with no set timeline and with inconsistent growth; therefore, middle school teachers should design flexible organizational structures that Stevenson (1998) describes as “predictability with uncertainty” (p. 123).

 

Did you know?

In many middle school classrooms, “Works in Progress” signs posted, accompanied by students’ work in various stages of completion, demonstrate to students that the end product requires several drafts.  In these classrooms students have the option of abandoning their first drafts and starting anew or students also have the flexibility of completing abandoned projects of others.

 

SafetyStudents of all ages need to feel safe, but since middle schoolers are going through such dramatic physiological, cognitive and emotional changes, they especially require this all three of the areas in order to succeed. 

 

Did you know?

            Research shows that if middle schools provide the following three “external assets” then kids’ levels of risk decline:

1) caring and supportive relationships *Advisory programs have been shown to be effective ways of developing supportive relationships with students so that students will feel safe in discussing concerns.

2) boundaries and limits *Listing clear guidelines and classroom rules aids students in understanding the boundaries of their environment.

3) structured use of time.  *Children need time to explore, but in ways that outlined so as to keep focused and progressively on target.

           

Social Interaction...At the middle school level students, more than ever, need time to work in groups and experience group decision making. This time for socializing accommodates teens “need for affiliation and personal belonging to a small community of peers” (Stevenson, 1998, p. 110).   Group activities also enable children to work with their peers within structured boundaries.  At this age, peers, not parents, have typically become the primary source of models and standards for young adolescents.  Therefore, structured time for modeling is optimum.

 

Did you know?

            According to Scales (1996), this type of “socializing has been called the primary work of early adolescence in much the same way that the primary work of early childhood is playing” (p.229).

 

CurriculumWith standards based education, teachers need to incorporate new and challenging techniques into their repertoire.  Developmentally appropriate curriculum that is integrative (link), and allows for team teaching of themes will enable students to make connections in their learning.

 

Such as….

1.      Lecture less, coach more.

2.      Provide exploratory options.

3.      Initiate upgraded mini courses.

4.      Encourage learning for “the sake of learning.”

5.      Explore grand themes, such as love, justice and money.

6.      Develop service projects.

 

Since the middle school years are the transitioning time from what Piaget described as moving from concrete to formal operations, then these young adolescents need direct experiences with hands on activities so as to understand abstract concepts.

 

Such as…manipulatives, service learning projects and role-plays.  One example of this is a math teacher, in teaching the concept of slope utilized a computer program that recorded students’ movements by means of a motion detector.  As students increased or decreased speed, they could visually and physically experience the concept of slope. Think of how this combines the kinesthetic, the visual/spatial and the cognitive intelligences!

 

Did you know?

“Only about one-third of eighth graders consistently demonstrate an ability to use formal operations” (Knowles and Brown, 2000, p. 19).  

 

Student Voice…When in doubt, ask the students.  Effective middle schools are increasing students’ voice in many ways.

 

Such as…

  1. Student led conferences
  2. Student government
  3. Student designed assignments

 

Ask students…What are the characteristics of a nurturing learning environment?

 

Then ask students…What are you, as an individual, willing to do to nurture this environment? (Bencivenga and Elias, 2003, p.20)

 

Then ask yourself, other teachers, administration, staff, parents, and the community these questions.

 

Diversity…Teachers need to recognize and empower the diversity of the students, both individually and as a whole.  Teachers need to work with other teachers, parents, and community members in ways to help students develop positive self-images through self-identity work and self-efficacy exploration.  Erikson’s stage theory of development points out that young adolescents describe themselves in terms of what they can and cannot do.  They also compare themselves to others and this can be critical to their self-concept.  This is why effective middle schools have tried to avoid the one winner approach and have incorporated more team competitions.  Middle schools also need to develop ways that every student can be a winner, but these need to meaningful, not arbitrary awarded.

Consider this…Since “every child is changing in a peer population where everyone else is also changing, previous answers to the question ‘Who am I’ may no longer fit” (Stevenson, 1998, p. 82).

 

Where to Begin

 

Many of these concepts and practices are not new and are alive and well in our middle schools.  However, there is still much work to be done and it takes a concerted effort on all of the stakeholders to be willing to step back from their current practices and critically look at making meaningful changes.  It is only in the last thirty or so years that we have begun to systematically break down our ways of teaching and how children learn and are now looking at education “more of a science than an art” (Marzano, Pickering and Pollock, 2001, p. 156).  Therefore, educators need to stay current on the latest studies.  The next step is to look at these current practices and begin to think in terms of human development by comparing their practice to what is developmentally appropriate for young adolescents.

 

 

 

 

References

 

Bencivenga, A., & Elias, M.  (2003).  Academic Learning Thrives in a Caring,

 

Sharing Educational Community.  Middle School Journal, 34 (5), 16-22.

 

Knowles, T., & Brown, D.  (2000).  What every Middle School Teacher should

 

know.  Portsmouth, NH:  Heinemann.

 

            Marzano, R., Pickering, D., & Pollock, J.  (2001).  Classroom Instruction that

 

Works.  Alexandria, VA:  Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

 

            Scales, P.  (1996).  A Responsive Ecology for Positive Young Adolescent

 

Development.  Clearing House, 69 (4), 226-230.

 

            Stevenson, C.  (1998).  Teaching Ten to Fourteen Year Olds.  (2nd ed.).  New York:  Longman.

            Van Hoose, J., Strahan, D., & L’Esperance, M.  (2001).  Promoting Harmony:  Young Adolescent Development and School Practices.  Westerville, Ohio:  National Middle School Association.

            Wheelock, A.  (1998).  Safe To Be Smart:  Building a Culture for Standards-Based Reform in the Middle Grades.  Columbus, Ohio:  National Middle School Association.